Both osteopaths and chiropractors tend to treat similar conditions with broadly similar techniques. Both professions undergo rigorous training and are obliged to undertake continuing professional development. Although the level of undergraduate and post graduate training for both professions is similar, some chiropractors in the UK refer to themselves as 'doctor'. Osteopaths, even if they hold a research doctorate, tend to avoid using this title as it may erroneously imply that the individual is a medical doctor.
Each profession is state regulated by an overseeing professional body; the General Osteopathic Council and the General Chiropractic Council respectively.
Both professions share a common history and philosophy which initially set them apart from the more traditional allopathic medical fields. Rather than focusing on the individual component parts of the body, osteopaths and chiropractors both view the body in a holistic manner, as a self-contained, self-healing, fully interconnected unit. The first proponent of this philosophy, Andrew Taylor Still, is credited with founding osteopathy in America in 1874. Just twenty-one years later, Daniel David Palmer, thought to be a former student of Dr. Still, founded the chiropractic discipline.
Chiropractors traditionally utilised more direct and swift technique to treat 'subluxation' of the spine, whilst osteopaths traditionally adopted greater use of less direct and less forceful leverage and soft tissue techniques to restore normal function when possible, as well as the cranial approach.
Neither profession is stuck in the past however, and as with modern medicine, ideas and approaches have changed considerably since the time of these early pioneers. Both professions, although proud of their history, are keen to integrate the latest research and evidence based practice into their work.
It is important to remember that both chiropractors and osteopaths address the same neuro-musculo-skeletal structures and use similar manipulative techniques. Traditionally osteopaths tended to work on soft tissues as well as joints, although many chiropractors also adopt this approach. One major difference was that chiroprators would take and utilise x-ray investigation more than would be typical for osteopaths, however, as the risks of ionising radiation became evident, and guidelines were published, fewer chiropractors now routinely use x-ray investigation.
There are always variations between individual practitioners of both disciplines, from what they focus on, to how they apply treatment. Every chiropractor and osteopath develops their own individual style of practice, and it is important for a patient to find a practice that fits his or her unique needs, regardless of the 'label'.